Washington Post
By David Nakamura
June 11, 2013
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-tries-to-bolster-support-for-sweeping-immigration-overhaul/2013/06/11/53830786-d2a8-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html
President Obama, his second-term
agenda bogged down amid political controversies and
partisan gridlock, moved to bolster support for a
sweeping overhaul of immigration laws, saying
Congress “needs to act and the moment is now.”
After months of allowing a
bipartisan Senate group to take the lead on a
comprehensive bill, Obama chose to re-enter the
debate with a speech in the East Room at a time when
conservative Republicans have begun mounting a
forceful opposition to the legislation.
The president acknowledged that the
867-page bill is a compromise in which neither
Democrats nor Republicans would get everything they
want. But he emphasized that the United States is a
“nation of immigrants” and said the estimated 11
million immigrants who are now in the country
illegally deserve a clear chance to become citizens.
“In the weeks to come, when
opponents try to gin up fear and create division and
spread the same old rumors and untruths . . . I want
you to think about your own parents, grandparents,
great-grandparents and all the men and women and
children who came here,” Obama said, flanked by a
coalition of business, faith and political leaders.
“The notion that they came through Ellis Island and
had all their papers right, had checked every box
and followed all the procedures before getting on
that boat . . . They were looking for a better
life just like these families.”
Obama made his remarks as the full
Senate was considering a motion to allow the
immigration bill to advance to the chamber floor,
potentially setting up weeks of debate on the most
ambitious overhaul of immigration laws in nearly
three decades.
Immigration proponents got a boost
from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.),
who said that while the legislation has “serious
flaws,” it was important for the chamber to allow it
to come forward for debate and not block it through
procedural maneuvers such as a filibuster.
“Doing nothing about the problem is
not a solution. It’s an avoidance strategy,”
McConnell said of the immigration system. “The
longer we wait to have this debate, as difficult as
it is, the harder it will be to solve the problem.”
The path forward for the bill will
not be easy. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a key member
of the bipartisan group that developed the
legislation, was preparing to offer an amendment
that would require illegal immigrants to learn
English before earning the legal residence permit
known as a green card.
Under the current proposal,
immigrants must be enrolled in English classes to
gain permanent legal status, but Rubio would require
them to be able to read, write and speak the
language. The bill says undocumented immigrants are
eligible for green cards after 10 years and
citizenship three years later if they pay fines and
taxes and do not commit crimes.
“On the day we announced the
principles that would shape the immigration bill, we
made it clear that English proficiency would now be
required for permanent residency for the first time
in American history,” Rubio said in a statement.
“This amendment ensures that will be the case.”
Rubio is considered a key member of
the bipartisan group because of his appeal to
conservatives, but he has said recently that the
legislation will not earn enough Republican support
without changes to strengthen border security.
That has left Democrats and
immigration advocates fearful that opponents will
add to the bill too many roadblocks for immigrants
to earn citizenship.
As Obama spoke at the White House,
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) took to the Senate floor
to talk about his proposal to require 100 percent
border security before any of the undocumented
immigrants receive legal status.
Cornyn noted that Democrats and
Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) have
described his bill as a “poison pill” amendment that
would unravel the bipartisan immigration proposal.
“But I believe the opposite is in
fact true,” Cornyn aid. “If we don’t guarantee
results on border security, if we don’t guarantee to
the American people that we actually are going to
get serious about stopping the flow of people
illegally crossing our northern, west or
southwestern border, that is the real poison pill.”
Obama made clear that he expected
the path to be straightforward for illegal
immigrants.
“Yes, they broke the rules. They
should wait their turn. They shouldn’t be let off
easily,” he said. “But the vast majority of these
individuals are not looking for trouble. They’re
just wanting to provide for their families,
contribute to their communities. They’re our
neighbors; we know their kids.”
By re-entering the debate this
week, the president is trying to exert his influence
while not upsetting the delicate balance of a
bipartisan group of eight senators that negotiated
the deal.
Though Obama has made the
immigration overhaul one of his top second-term
priorities, his administration has played mostly a
supportive role as the Senate group took the lead in
drafting the legislation. White House aides have
said the president recognizes that being too far in
front on immigration could risk scaring off
Republicans fearful of being tied too closely with
the administration.
The president emphasized that his
administration has invested heavily in border
security measures, noting that attempted border
crossings have fallen to historically low levels and
that deportation rates are at record highs.
“Nobody’s taking border enforcement
lightly,” he said.
But he chastised House Republicans
for voting last week to de-fund his executive order
last summer to defer deportations for otherwise law-abiding young people brought to the country illegally by their parents as children. The move by
the GOP is unlikely to become law but was intended
as a symbolic measure to express its displeasure
that the president has gone around Congress to make
the order.
“That’s not who we are,” Obama said
of the GOP vote. “We owe it to Americans to do
better.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment