Wall Street Journal
By Sara Murray and Corey Boles
June 10, 2013
Efforts
to secure the border with Mexico will be a central focus as a sweeping
overhaul of the nation's immigration laws moves to the Senate floor this
week, the start of a marathon month of debate on the bill.
Senators
are set to vote Tuesday on a procedural motion to formally bring the
bill to the floor, which requires 60 votes to pass and would open debate
on a stream of amendments, including many that could split the
coalition of senators backing the bill and endanger its chances of
passage.
The
bill would establish a procedure for many of the nation's 11 million
illegal immigrants to gain legal status, ratchet up border security and
rework the system of visas for temporary workers from abroad. It is the
first broad effort to rewrite immigration laws since 2007.
The
bipartisan group of eight senators that crafted the bill is still torn
over how much to adjust the legislation to win additional support,
particularly from Republicans looking to strengthen requirements for
border security. Border security is a particularly sensitive issue,
because the legislation sets security benchmarks that must be met before
anyone currently in the country illegally can receive green cards and
become legal permanent residents.
Among
the expected amendments is a border-security plan from Sen. John Cornyn
(R., Texas). It would require biometric systems at all land and sea
ports to monitor who is exiting from the U.S., a more expensive option
than the tracking system now in the bill. It also would call for
complete operational control of the U.S. border with Mexico before
illegal immigrants can receive green cards, a tougher benchmark than in
the current bill, which requires a border-security plan to be
"substantially deployed."
If
Mr. Cornyn's plan is adopted, "Democrats will start to bail from the
bill," said Frank Sharry, executive director for pro-immigration group
America's Voice. "That's why it's a poison pill. It's designed to
destabilize."
Some
Democrats, including Sen. Dick Durbin (D., Ill.), a member of the
bipartisan group of eight, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.,
Nev.), want to make as few changes as possible during the Senate debate,
senior Democratic aides said. They argue that the Republicans will have
a chance to alter the bill when the Senate negotiates a final version
with the Republican-controlled House.
Other
Democrats, including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, say the more
important goal is to corral as many senators from both parties as
possible to back the bill now, in order to build momentum for the House
to act, another senior Democratic aide said.
In
addition to tougher border-security provisions, Democrats expect
Republicans to try to bolster a provision requiring the payment of back
taxes by illegal immigrants who are seeking to become legal residents.
Lawmakers may also try to expand the list of crimes that would exclude
someone from applying for residency, and they may try to tighten the
asylum and refugee systems in the aftermath of the Boston marathon
bombings, which were allegedly carried out by the sons of a Chechen man
who sought asylum in the U.S.
Last
week, House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) said he hoped the House
Judiciary Committee would pass a bill or a series of bills by the end of
June that could then be brought to the House floor.
On
Friday, Sens. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) and Mike Lee (R., Utah),
immigration-bill critics, offered a preview of the contentious debate
that lies ahead. The two spent hours taking turns hammering the bill on
an otherwise empty Senate floor after many lawmakers had already left
town for the weekend.
"There
is no one amendment that can fix this bill," Mr. Lee said. "There is no
series of tinkering changes that will turn this mess of a bill into the
reform the country needs and that Americans deserve."
Border-security
amendments are just one in a number of issues that could upset the
fragile balance the immigration bill is relying on in order to secure
backing from Democrats, Republicans and such outside interests as labor
unions and the business organizations.
"I'm
concerned the thing's going to fall apart if we don't watch it. I hope
it won't," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.). "There's many friction
lines."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment