Bloomberg
By Heidi Przybyla and Erik Wasson
December 4, 2014
The
U.S. House voted to block President Barack Obama’s immigration orders
in a symbolic move meant to clear the way for action next week to fund
the U.S. government and avoid a shutdown.
The
219-197 vote today allowed Republicans to vent their frustration over
Obama’s decision to ease deportation rules for millions of undocumented
immigrants without holding up a spending bill.
Some Republicans wanted to attach the immigration language to a
government spending measure, which would have led to a standoff with
Democrats.
“The
American people were crystal clear about their dislike” of Obama’s
action on immigration, third-ranking House Republican Steve Scalise of
Louisiana said during today’s floor debate. “This
legislation says ‘you can’t do that, Mr. President. There’s a rule of
law.’”
Current
government funding ends Dec. 11. House Appropriations Chairman Hal
Rogers, a Kentucky Republican, said today that he and his Senate
counterpart, Democrat Barbara Mikulski, plan tomorrow
to “sign off on the final deal” to fund most of the government through
September 2015.
A
previously skeptical Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader,
signaled that the funding bill is likely to get her members’ support if
Boehner entertains some Democratic demands.
“Let
us supply the votes to keep government open but we can’t do that unless
we have a bill worthy of our support,” Pelosi of California told
reporters today.
Democratic Opposition
Still, many Democrats spoke against the immigration measure today.
“Prior
presidents were not met with such obstructionism,” said Representative
Zoe Lofgren of California, who has negotiated with Republicans on
immigration legislation. “He cannot change the
law and he has not done so. He does have the authority to grant
temporary relief to some.”
Boehner
and his lieutenants in the House devised the two-step strategy to keep
the dispute over immigration from causing a repeat of the 16-day partial
shutdown in October 2013, which stemmed
from a Republican bid to use spending legislation to defund Obamacare.
The
Senate doesn’t plan to take up today’s immigration bill, and the Obama
administration said the president would veto the measure if it reached
his desk.
The second step requires both chambers to pass a separate measure funding almost all of the federal government.
“We think this is the most practical way to fight the president’s actions,” Boehner of Ohio told reporters today.
Leaders’ Concession
In
a minor concession to some conservatives, House leaders are considering
a revision that would move up a fight over immigration funding to soon
after Congress reconvenes in January instead
of in March.
Democrats
want to cut from the spending bill at least 70 Republican-sponsored
provisions that would poke holes in Obama’s policies on the environment,
health care and other matters, Representative
Jim Moran, a Virginia Democrat, said yesterday.
“We
are like Amtrak,” Mikulski of Maryland, the Senate appropriations
chair, said today. “We’ve left the station, we’re headed to our
destination and we will have some stops along the way.”
Under
Boehner’s approach, the Department of Homeland Security, with primary
responsibility for immigration policy, would be funded only into March
2015.
Senate Majority
That
would set up a clash over Obama’s immigration orders early next year,
when Boehner and incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will
face more pressure from the expanded Republican
majority to retaliate against Obama’s orders.
Republicans won control of the Senate and increased their House majority in November’s election.
Boehner
said the Homeland Security funding strategy lets Republicans keep “our
leverage so that when we have reinforcements in the Senate, we’re in the
strongest position to take additional
action to fight the president’s unilateral action.”
“There
are three or four general arrows that are being talked about.
Leadership, to their credit, is listening,” said Representative Kevin
Brady, a Texas Republican.
Some
opponents of Boehner’s approach want funding for immigration-related
agencies to expire in January so the new Republican-led Congress can
defund parts of the agency tasked with carrying
out Obama’s orders. Boehner may agree to move the date to February,
according to a Republican aide who sought anonymity to describe the
private talks.
Obama Encouraged
Obama
said yesterday he was encouraged by statements from Boehner and
McConnell about preventing another shutdown, “and I take them at their
word.”
“The
one thing I can say for certain is that no one benefits by the
government shutting down,” the president told members of the Business
Roundtable in Washington.
In
the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would be open to
Boehner’s approach if Republican leaders could gather enough House votes
to advance it.
Still,
some Republicans in Congress favor an immediate fight over Obama’s
immigration orders by holding up funding for immigration-related
agencies starting next week.
“The
entire constitutional structure is at stake,” Senator Jeff Sessions, an
Alabama Republican who opposes the funding measure, said today. “I
don’t think it’s dawned on people” and “I don’t
think we should be timid about it.”
‘Show Vote’
At
a news conference yesterday, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said passing a
symbolic bill against the deportation orders would be a “meaningless
show vote.”
Cruz,
who led the drive for the 2013 shutdown, said Congress should pass a
short-term spending bill that blocks Obama’s immigration orders through
funding for the Department of Homeland Security
and Department of Justice.
Cruz also said the Senate should block confirmations for all non-national security presidential appointments.
Reid
said the Senate won’t consider the House immigration bill, H.R. 5759,
which would deny the president authority to protect undocumented
immigrants in the U.S. from deportation.
Obama
announced Nov. 20 that he would temporarily halt deportations for about
5 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. His directive will defer for three years the deportation of people who came to the U.S. as children as well as parents of children who are
citizens or legal permanent residents.
The
Department of Homeland Security will streamline the visa process for
foreign workers and their employers and give high-skilled workers more
flexible work authorization.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment