Politico
By Jennifer Epstein
December 8, 2014
The
Obama administration will Monday unveil its long-anticipated updates to
its guidelines on racial profiling, tightening limits on the practice
but still allowing federal
law enforcement agencies to employ it at airports and along the border.
The
new rules replace guidelines created by the Bush administration in
2003, which banned racial profiling for federal law enforcement, but
included broad exemptions for
national security and border security. The Bush rules applied only to
race, but the new policy also bans profiling on the basis of religion,
national origin, sexual orientation and gender identification.
The
release of the new guidelines comes at a moment of heightened national
attention on the role that race plays in law enforcement, amid continued
protests spurred by
the killings of black men in New York and Ferguson, Missouri, by white
police officers.
But
it has been in the making for more than five years, with Attorney
General Eric Holder pressing to complete the project before his
departure from the Justice Department,
expected early next year. During the past two weeks, it was the first
agenda item at his daily senior staff morning meetings, a department
official said, adding: “It will be one of the signature accomplishments
of his tenure.”
“As
attorney general, I have repeatedly made clear that profiling by law
enforcement is not only wrong, it is profoundly misguided and
ineffective — because it wastes
precious resources and undermines the public trust,” Holder said in a
statement. “Particularly in light of certain recent incidents we’ve seen
at the local level — and the widespread concerns about trust in the
criminal justice process which so many have raised
throughout the nation — it’s imperative that we take every possible
action to institute strong and sound policing practices.”
Holder
hopes that federal agencies’ use of the new guidelines will lead by
example, showing state and local authorities that “successful policing
does not require profiling,”
the official said. He will brief local law enforcement leaders during a
Monday conference call and follow up with other events in the weeks
ahead, including a speech on Tuesday in Memphis.
The
guidelines apply to state and local law enforcement officers while they
are participating in federal law enforcement task forces, but not more
broadly.
They
do, though, apply to all federal law enforcement agencies, including
those housed in the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland
Security.
The
guidelines include what DHS described in a preview as “stringent and
expanded anti-profiling requirements” for all U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement civil immigration
enforcement, federal air marshals, and U.S. Border Patrol enforcement
not in the vicinity of the border.
But
there are exceptions: for screening and inspection at the border and
for transportation security, for Border Control and ICE activities at
the border, and for Secret
Service protective activities. But, DHS said, “This does not mean that
officers and agents are free to profile. To the contrary, DHS’ existing
policies make it categorically clear that profiling is prohibited, while
articulating limited circumstances where
it is permissible to rely in part on these characteristics, because of
the unique nature of border and transportation security, as compared to
traditional law enforcement.”
DHS
has committed to conducting an additional review aimed at examining the
practices not barred by the new guidelines “to ensure we are including
every appropriate safeguard
and civil rights protection in the execution of those important
security activities, and to enhance our policies where necessary.”
The
American Civil Liberties Union welcomed the revisions as “an important
step in reducing the prevalence of racial profiling in federal law
enforcement.” But Laura Murphy,
the director of the group’s Washington legislative office, also warned
that it does not do enough to guard against profiling by state and local
law enforcement.
“We think that a nationwide ban on this unconstitutional practice is in order,” she said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment