New York Times
By Thomas Kaplan and Jesse McKinley
March 17, 2014
ALBANY
— In a surprise vote, the New York State Senate on Monday rejected
legislation that would have granted state tuition aid to undocumented
immigrants, dealing a blow
to immigrants’ advocates who had made it their top priority in the
capital.
The
Senate, controlled by Republicans and a small group of Democrats,
failed to pass the measure despite a vote of 30 in favor and 29 opposed.
It required 32 votes in
favor to pass.
Immigrants’
advocates have been leaning on the Senate for months. But Republicans
had shown no interest in considering the legislation, and the decision
to hold a vote
on Monday came abruptly, with almost no notice.
Even
advocates were surprised: Latino activists who had planned to visit the
Capitol on Tuesday to lobby for the measure said they would now use the
trip to express their
frustration.
All
of the Republicans present voted against the measure; two Democrats,
Simcha Felder of Brooklyn and Ted O’Brien of the Rochester area, also
voted no.
“So
many legal families are struggling with the high cost of college
education right now,” said Senator Mark J. Grisanti, a Republican from
Buffalo.
The
vote on Monday came after a tense debate that stretched for more than
an hour and was filled with emotional pleas for support from many Latino
and black senators.
“This is an opportunity — an opportunity to do the right thing,” said
Senator José R. Peralta, Democrat of Queens.
The
legislation would have allowed undocumented students who met certain
conditions to receive financial aid through state programs, like the
Tuition Assistance Program.
It would also have created a private scholarship fund for the children
of immigrants, and allowed undocumented students and their families to
open college savings accounts.
The
Democratic-controlled State Assembly passed the measure last month.
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, had not been a vocal advocate for its
passage, which irritated
a number of Hispanic lawmakers, but he had been expected to sign it if
the Senate passed it. But it had been unclear for months if the bill had
the necessary Senate support.
The
measure, known as the Dream Act, got its name from federal legislation
that would provide a path to citizenship for young immigrants who
entered the country illegally.
The New York measure would not offer an opportunity to gain legal
status.
More
than a dozen states offer in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants.
New York has done so for more than a decade, and an estimated 8,300
undocumented immigrants
were attending public institutions of higher education in the state in
the fall of 2013.
But
only four states — California, New Mexico, Texas and Washington —offer
state financial aid to undocumented students, according to the National
Conference of State
Legislatures.
The
decision to hold a vote in the Senate was orchestrated by Senator
Jeffrey D. Klein of the Bronx, the leader of the Independent Democratic
Conference, a five-member
group that shares power with the Senate Republicans.
It
was a rare instance of Senate-floor drama. It is highly unusual to hold
a vote on legislation in Albany when passage is not guaranteed. Last
year, not a single piece
of legislation was defeated in a floor vote in the Senate, according to
the New York Public Interest Research Group.
But
Mr. Klein had been criticized for partnering with Senate Republicans,
who have blocked a number of measures sought by liberal lawmakers.
Democrats suspected he wanted
to put the measure to a vote to avoid accusations from the left that he
was complicit in bottling it up.
Speaking
on the Senate floor, Mr. Klein recalled his own family history of
immigration to the United States, as well as the nation’s tradition of
welcoming people from
foreign lands.
“You’re either standing up for these students to get their shot, or standing in the way,” he said.
But
Javier H. Valdés, the co-executive director of Make the Road New York, a
Latino advocacy group, questioned why Mr. Klein had pushed for the vote
when one Republican
senator who was seen as a possible supporter, Phil Boyle of Long
Island, was absent.
“Our
sense was that we were set up to lose, and that’s very concerning,” Mr.
Valdés said. “Why would they call a vote so quickly that’s been debated
for so long?”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment