Wall Street Journal
By Laura Meckler and Beth Reinhard
March 19, 2014
Republicans
are divided over how to achieve two conflicting goals: Maximizing wins
in 2014 congressional races and better positioning the party for the
2016 presidential
contest, when the electorate will look much different.
Some
Republicans argue that with President Barack Obama's poll numbers
sinking and his health-care law unpopular, the party is on course for
big House and Senate gains
this fall. The worst thing the party could do, they say, is to take up
contentious matters such as an immigration overhaul or some social
issues, which would divide the party and could prompt GOP voters to stay
home.
But
others say the party has become too risk-averse. It needs to take steps
now, they say, to reverse the party's losing record in the popular vote
in five of the last
six presidential elections and start appealing to the more diverse
electorate that will turn out for the 2016 election.
It
is the converse of a possible problem for the Democratic Party, where
some leaders worry donors and activists aren't working hard enough to
prevent losses in midterm
contests.
Bill
McInturff, a longtime GOP pollster who has advised congressional and
presidential campaigns, said his party's problem is that most GOP
congressional districts have
been drawn to be overwhelmingly white, insulating congressional
Republicans from the larger demographic shifts afoot in the nation.
"They don't know what's coming" demographically, he said. "It may well take another presidential loss before they figure out."
Others
worry that a big win this year could persuade Republicans that they can
stave off issues such as immigration even longer. Victories in "2014
could be a false narcotic
for Republicans,'' said Ari Fleischer, a former press secretary for
President George W. Bush, who helped write an autopsy of the 2012
election for the Republican National Committee.
But
GOP strategist Kevin Madden, who served as a senior adviser to Mitt
Romney's presidential campaign, as well as to House Republicans, thinks
it is too early to target
the 2016 electorate.
"The
party has to focus on areas where they agree and where they think they
have the most favorable contrast with the opposition party," he said.
Mr. Madden said it would
be a particular mistake to try right now to tackle a rewrite of
immigration laws, which divide Republicans.
A
GOP House leadership aide added that the imperatives for a presidential
election will be taken care of "in due course." In any case, he said,
views in 2016 will be chiefly
shaped by the Republican nominee, not by Congress.
The
differing strategies stem from the fact that the voter pool varies by
election year. The midterm pool tends to be older and less diverse than
the electorate in presidential
years.
White
voters, who skew Republican, accounted for 72% of the electorate in the
2012 presidential contest but were 77% of the electorate in the 2010
midterms. Seniors, who
also have favored the GOP in recent years, accounted for 16% of the
electorate in 2012 but 21% in the midterms two years earlier.
Meanwhile, voters age 18-29, who tend to favor Democrats, grew from 12% of the electorate in 2010 to 19% in 2012.
The
most acute dispute among Republicans is when and whether the House
should tackle immigration, including the prospect of granting some kind
of legal status to many
of the 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally.
Many
Republicans say that addressing the issue is critical to attracting
more Hispanic voters. The 2012 report for the RNC concluded the party
"must embrace and champion
comprehensive immigration reform," an unusually blunt endorsement of a
position that many in the party oppose. It concluded: "If we do not, our
party's appeal will continue to shrink to its core constituencies
only."
So
far, House Republicans have decided to wait, fearful that a legislative
debate would stir an intra-party fight. This week, RNC Chairman Reince
Priebus played down the
report's recommendation, saying the party cannot tackle immigration
until there is more of a consensus in the GOP. He also argued the
party's move to put Hispanic outreach staff in communities was more
important than passing a bill. "Showing up is a big part
of the battle," he said.
Other
Republicans say the House is making a big mistake if it doesn't take
the immigration issue off the table this year, contending the task will
grow harder in 2015.
GOP
strategist Whit Ayres said the most important imperative for the party
is to attract more racial minorities. "The forces at work are highly
likely to produce so strong
a Republican year that the party can afford to take some steps for
longer-term success," he said.
Social
issues present another challenge, particularly for young voters who
overwhelmingly favor gay rights and marijuana decriminalization, among
other issues putting
them at odds with the GOP. "If we become the party where young people
roll their eyes when they see us coming, we have a problem," Mr.
Fleischer said. "That has a lot to do with tolerance and
open-mindedness."
Debate
is also underway over how specific Republicans should be in offering
their own positive ideas, particularly on health care, at a time when
the party is focused
on highlighting the problems with the Affordable Care Act. Some
Republicans say a more positive vision is needed to build the party
beyond that.
House
Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia is readying a legislative
proposal on health care, which is expected to include a collection of
familiar conservative ideas.
An aide said the most controversial idea, changing the tax treatment of
health-care benefits, is on the table along with other more modest
proposals.
But no decisions have been made about what will be in the legislation or when it will see a vote in the House, the aide said.
"It's
hard to position yourself for a presidential election when you first
need to take back the Senate," said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, a
former top congressional
aide who favors taking up immigration this year. "After that happens,
you're going to see a giant pivot by everyone on winning back the White
House. But right now, it's on the most immediate needs."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment