Bloomberg Businessweek
By Michael C. Bender
March 24, 2014
A
review of the U.S. deportation system ordered by President Barack Obama
is seen by pro-immigration Democrats as good policy and good politics.
It’s
appeasing the party’s Senate leaders, who’d rather criticize the
Republican-led House over immigration policy than spar with the White
House over deportations.
Administration
officials and staff for top Senate Democrats, including Majority Leader
Harry Reid of Nevada, met privately on March 11 as the party aims to
alleviate tensions
heading into the November congressional election.
Senate
staff told administration representatives that Obama’s options include
stopping the deportations of parents of U.S. citizens and others who
would be protected under
a Senate bill that passed last year, according to a person familiar
with the meeting who requested anonymity to describe it.
“There
are a lot of people hoping for these changes,” said Eliseo Medina, head
of an immigration campaign for the Service Employees International
Union, which claims 2.1
million members. The group spent $41 million supporting mostly
Democrats in the 2012 election, according to the Center for Responsive
Politics, a Washington group that tracks political spending.
Deportations
have been at the center of a debate over whether to provide a path to
citizenship for people living in the U.S. illegally, the most
contentious part of immigration
revamp bill that the Senate passed last year.
Microsoft, Caterpillar
More
than 640 groups and companies including Microsoft Corp. (MSFT:US) and
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT:US) lobbied on immigration issues in 2013, a 79
percent increase from
2012, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama’s
announcement this month that his administration would find ways to
“more humanely” enforce immigration laws earned praise from Democratic
lawmakers and Hispanic
groups on an issue that Medina said may become prominent in some
congressional contests in November.
Still,
that unity may be short lived, said Representative Luis Gutierrez, an
Illinois Democrat and an influential voice within his party on
immigration policy.
“I
want to make sure we don’t take our foot off any pedal that’s moving
the engine toward the ultimate resolution,” he said in an interview.
“And in the end, the ultimate
resolution is to pass a bill.”
The measure the Senate passed has been stalled in the House.
Hispanic Support
Obama’s
support among Hispanics has been waning as deportations averaged 1,000 a
day last year, more than under any other president. The president’s job
approval rating
among Hispanics is 52 percent, according to a poll released last week
by Gallup, down from 73 percent in a survey last May.
In
Colorado, where Democratic Senator Mark Udall seeks re-election this
year, 53 percent of Hispanic voters disapprove of Obama’s performance,
according to a Public Policy
Polling survey released last week. Exit polls show Obama won 71 percent
of the Hispanic vote nationally in 2012, including 75 percent in
Colorado.
The
president has been under pressure from churches and labor groups,
including the AFL-CIO, who say he can gain favor with Hispanic voters by
changing deportation policies.
Richard
Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, has said Obama would increase his
leverage with Republicans on the immigration issue by halting
deportations for all but violent
criminals. The labor group, which says it has 12.5 million members,
spent $31.7 million helping elect mostly Democrats in 2012, according to
the Center for Responsive Politics.
Pelosi, Durbin
House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said in December
that Obama should reduce deportations. That followed concerns raised by
Richard Durbin of Illinois,
the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, before Jeh Johnson was confirmed as
secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. In a letter to
Johnson, Durbin said he was troubled that the administration deported
200,000 parents of U.S. citizens from 2010 to 2012.
New
York Senator Chuck Schumer, the chamber’s No. 3 Democrat, this month
released a statement calling on the administration to halt deportations
of immigrants who would
be able to stay under the Senate bill. That measure, opposed by House
Republican leaders, would create a path to citizenship for many of the
12 million undocumented workers in the U.S.
The
Congressional Hispanic Caucus was set to vote March 13 on a resolution
backing Schumer’s statement until the White House asked them to postpone
the action pending
a meeting between some of its members and Obama in the Oval Office,
Gutierrez said in an interview.
That
night, Obama told Gutierrez and two other caucus members that he’d
asked Johnson to take an inventory of deportation practices to “see how
it can conduct enforcement
more humanely within the confines of the law,” according to a statement
the White House issued at the time.
Goal Achieved
“Everybody
felt like our goal had been accomplished,” Gutierrez said about the
group’s decision to sidetrack its vote and instead work with Obama on
the issue. “We want
to find solutions with him, and this opened that door.”
The
next day, the president met with 17 immigration advocates for almost
two hours, describing “the deep concern he has for the pain these
families face” when they’re
separated because of deportations, according to another White House
statement.
Ali
Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a
Washington-based group that supports easing U.S. immigration laws, said
he left the session thinking
that Obama wouldn’t take any action until at least August, when
lawmakers take a month-long break.
“It seems this review will go through that period,” Noorani said in an interview.
Executive Actions
The
legislative process would be doomed if Obama sidestepped Congress and
took any major executive actions, said Marc Rosenblum, deputy director
of the U.S. immigration
policy program for the Washington-based Migration Policy Institute.
“For
the president to make any broad changes would really set the
legislative discussion back in a big way,” Rosenblum said in an
interview.
Peter
Boogaard, a Homeland Security Department spokesman, said it was
premature to discuss specific considerations. He said the review Obama
ordered was “ongoing and will
be conducted expeditiously.”
While
White House and the Homeland Security officials declined to provide
details of what the inventory will entail, advocates have offered their
own definitions of what
more humane deportation policies would look like. They’ve identified
changes that would protect millions of undocumented workers from
deportation.
Exempting Parents
Medina
of the SEIU and others have said Obama should expand his 2012 action that blocked deportation of some undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children. Exempting
their parents, as well, could spare about 500,000 immigrants from being
expelled, Rosenblum said.
Another
recommendation -- exempting undocumented immigrants who have jobs in
the U.S. -- would protect as many as 6.4 million more people, according
to a May 2013 estimate
from the Migration Policy Institute.
One
of the suggestions from Senate staff members to Reid, Durbin, Schumer
and New Jersey’s Bob Menendez -- to exempt parents of U.S. citizens --
would mean protecting
4.4 million adults from deportation, according to a January report by
the National Foundation for American Policy, a Virginia-based research
group that focuses on immigration among other issues.
Medina
said stricter adherence to the administration’s own policies would
limit some deportations. While officials have said deportations are
spurred by national security,
public safety and border protection concerns, Medina and others say the
policy has been applied more broadly.
“If they just implement those policies accordingly, it will go a long way to solving the problem,” he said in an interview.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment