SaintPetersBlog (Opinion-Florida)
By Martin Dyckman
June 9, 2015
Were any of your ancestors here to meet the Godspeed at Jamestown or the Mayflower at Plymouth Rock?
No?
Then
you, like me, belong to an immigrant family. Your forebears may have
been here longer than mine, who came in the late 1800s, but we are alike
in that none of our
American roots were planted with the permission of the only people who
had the right to give it.
The
so-called “sale” of Manhattan Island for a few dollars’ worth of
baubles has been vastly misunderstood by pop history. As Russell Shorto
points out in his excellent
book, The Island at the Center of the World, “The Indians had a
different idea of land ownership from the Europeans. With no concept of
permanent property transfer, Indians of the Northeast saw a real estate
deal as a combination of a rental agreement and
a treaty or alliance between two groups.”
But I digress.
If
the history of the United States were to be seen through a single lens,
the focus would be immigration. Unlike any other nation, America as we
know it was built entirely
by relatively recent immigrants – including the millions brought here
against their will as slaves – and it is to all of them that we owe
everything we have and everything we are.
Yet
there are some who want to pull the ladder up and step on the faces of
those still trying to climb it, and a foul-smelling bunch of politicians
eager to do it.
Those
who yammer about illegal immigration might want to check their own
family trees for people who bent or evaded the law, usually through
Canada, after a Congress festering
in isolationism and bigotry finally began to impose national quotas and
elaborate rules in the early 20th century.
The
quotas were deliberately constructed to favor northern Europeans and to
obstruct eastern Europeans – meaning Jews – and the darker-complexioned
people from the Mediterranean,
Africa and the Far East.
The
history of this immigrant nation is told broadly at Ellis Island, but
there’s another not-be-missed museum in New York City that you might not
have heard about and
is well worth a visit
It’s
the Tenement Museum on Orchard Street in the Lower East Side, which
offers tours of the neighborhood and visits to an actual tenement
building, where several apartments
have been restored to show how families lived at them at different
points in time – beginning when there was no electricity or indoor
plumbing.
They
lived in appalling conditions, not by choice but because it’s all there
was, and left as soon they were able. It’s a testament to the triumph
of the human spirit
and the meaning of America.
Immigrants
built the railroads, mined and milled the iron ore and coal, and
account for the rich diversity in our religious faiths and other
cultural traditions.
Without them today, we’d starve for want of fruit and vegetables. The construction industry would crash.
A
recent report from the North Carolina Budget and Tax Center said
immigrants are strengthening, not weakening, the state’s economy,
generating a larger share of activity
than their percentage of the population, and account for more than 20
percent of Main Street business owners. Counties with larger immigrant
populations average lower unemployment rates and levels of poverty and
higher wages than counties with few immigrants,
the report said.
Whether
legal or not, our recent immigrants are here for precisely the same
reason your ancestors and mine came: to make a better life for
themselves and their families
– for the love of those families, exactly as Jeb Bush says.
They
are making our nation stronger, not weaker, and most Americans agree
with Bush on that point too. But a recent Pew Research Center poll found
that to be a shrinking
majority, due probably to the drumbeat of bigotry from the right wing.
Still, some 72 percent of us agree also that a way should be found to
allow permanent residence for those without papers.
That’s
a substantial majority, yet among the Republicans who look in the
mirror and see a president only Bush represents that majority. The
others cater to the paranoia
and, yes, the racism that has corrupted their party.
When
a Tea Party rally whoops and hollers for one congressman who compares
immigrants to cockroaches and for another who tells a trembling 11-year
old citizen to her face
that her undocumented father deserves to be deported, it’s hard to
distinguish those events from a Ku Klux Klan cross-burning.
No
grand dragon ever revealed his bigotry more vividly than Phyllis
Schlafly did in a recent diatribe against President Barack Obama’s
attempts to humanize immigration
policy.
Immigrants
today, she complained “are not the same sort as the immigrants who
contributed so much to building our great country…they don’t want to
leave their homes and
become Americans, accepting all that comes along with it. Many of them
just want to reap the rewards of our free nation without accepting
American culture, the English language and the rule of law.”
That’s
so untrue that Pinocchio would blush. She wouldn’t be talking that way
if the people in question were white-skinned folk fleeing an economic
crisis in Canada rather
than citizens of countries where the motivation is spelled pobreza.
Secondly, most of the people she doesn’t like would gladly stay, and
bring their families, if only we would let them. Thirdly, many earlier
waves of immigrants – especially the older people
– continued to speak native languages such as Italian, German, Chinese
and Yiddish. It didn’t hurt us. And as past volunteers for a Literacy
Council, my wife and I can testify that there are plenty of
Spanish-speakers eager to learn English.
Strange,
isn’t it, that we don’t hear the right wing complaining about the
prevalence of Cuban Spanish in South Florida? The difference is that if
the Mexicans are allowed
to stay and become citizens, they’d vote Democratic.
And no wonder.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com



No comments:
Post a Comment