Washington Post
By Jonathan Adler
June 8, 2015
During
Monday’s news conference after the G-7 summit, in addition to
commenting on King v. Burwell, President Obama expressed his
“frustration” that a lower court has
blocked implementation of his immigration reforms.
Here are the relevant portions of the White House transcript:
QUESTION:
I wanted to ask you about the possibility that the court battle over
your actions on immigration could extend late into your term. Do you
think that there’s
anything more that you can do for the people who would have benefited
from that program and now are in limbo? And how do you view the
possibility of your term ending without accomplishing your goals on
immigration?
PRESIDENT
OBAMA: With respect to immigration, obviously, I’m frustrated by a
district court ruling that now is winding its way through the appeals
process. We are being
as aggressive as we can legally to, first and foremost, appeal that
ruling, and then to implement those elements of immigration executive
actions that were not challenged in court.
But,
obviously, the centerpiece, one of the key provisions for me was being
able to get folks who are undocumented to go through a background check —
criminal background
check — pay back taxes, and then have a legal status. And that requires
an entire administrative apparatus and us getting them to apply and
come clean.
I
made a decision, which I think is the right one, that we should not
accept applications until the legal status of this is clarified. I am
absolutely convinced this is
well within my legal authority, Department of Homeland Security’s legal
authority. If you look at the precedent, if you look at the traditional
discretion that the executive branch possesses when it comes to
applying immigration laws, I am convinced that what
we’re doing is lawful, and our lawyers are convinced that what we’re
doing is lawful.
But
the United States is a government of laws and separations of power, and
even if it’s an individual district court judge who’s making this
determination, we’ve got
to go through the process to challenge it. And until we get clarity
there, I don’t want to bring people in, have them apply and jump through
a lot of hoops only to have it deferred and delayed further.
Of
course, there’s one really great way to solve this problem, and that
would be Congress going ahead and acting, which would obviate the need
for executive actions. The
majority of the American people I think still want to see that happen. I
suspect it will be a major topic of the next presidential campaign.
And
so we will continue to push as hard as we can on all fronts to fix a
broken immigration system. Administratively, we’ll be prepared if and
when we get the kind of
ruling that I think we should have gotten in the first place about our
authorities to go ahead and implement. But ultimately, this has never
fully replaced the need for Congress to act. And my hope is, is that
after a number of the other issues that we’re
working on currently get cleared, that some quiet conversations start
back up again, particularly in the Republican Party, about the
shortsighted approach that they’re taking when it comes to immigration.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com



No comments:
Post a Comment