Roll Call (Opinion)
By Stuart Rothenberg
June 8, 2015
The
Republican presidential field looks unusually diverse this cycle — an
African-American (Ben Carson), an Indian-American (Bobby Jindal), a
woman (Carly Fiorina) and
a Hispanic, or, if you prefer, a Cuban (Marco Rubio). One candidate is
married to a Hispanic originally from Mexico (Jeb Bush).
There is even a Canadian in the field.
Oh, wait. That can’t be.
The Canadian actually is half Cuban (Ted Cruz), so that really makes one-and-a-half Cubans in the race.
For a political party that relies overwhelmingly on the votes of whites, that’s a pretty diverse group.
But
most of the candidates frequently mentioned as being in the top tier in
the Republican race — Bush, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul — are non-Hispanic
white men. The lone exception is Rubio.
(Some
observers also include Cruz and potentially Ohio Gov. John R. Kasich in
the top tier. But Cruz’s style and ideological rigidity limit his
ultimate appeal, both in
the GOP and, more importantly, in November. Kasich is merely another
white guy.)
With
whites constituting a smaller percentage of the general-election
electorate over the past two decades — from 85 percent of the electorate
in 1988 to 77 percent in
2004, 72 percent in 2012 and probably no more than 70 percent next year
— and Republicans faring poorly with blacks, Latinos and even
Asian-Americans, GOP strategists are looking to make the party more
welcoming and appealing to minority voters.
Given his background, Rubio would seem to have a general-election appeal other top-tier hopefuls don’t have.
Paul,
of course, argues his more tolerant positions on cultural issues make
him more appealing to younger voters, while his free-market approach to
immigration enhances
his appeal among Hispanic voters.
But
Paul’s views on foreign policy and national security seem at odds with
most of his party, and while libertarians have a foothold in the GOP,
the party is dominated
by traditional conservatives, most of whom aren’t the least bit
comfortable with the libertarian approach to foreign policy or cultural
issues.
Bush
speaks fluent Spanish, and his wife and children, who presumably would
be on the stump with him from time to time, would help him paint a
different picture of the
GOP. Moreover, the former Florida governor’s positions on immigration
and his emphasis on education as governor of Florida could give him an
entrée into the minority community and with younger voters.
But
Bush’s family tree is a very mixed blessing, and it makes it difficult
for the establishment favorite to present himself as a vehicle for
change and to appeal to distrustful
conservatives.
And Walker?
The
Wisconsin governor’s appeal to the GOP base is understandable. He took
on organized labor and state employees in 2011, when he sought to limit
collective bargaining
rights in the state — yet he is a conservative Republican from the
upper Midwest whose style seems more measured than some of his angrier,
confrontational colleagues in the race.
But
at least on the surface, Walker is the least likely top-tier Republican
hopeful to broaden the image of his party. By the time Election Day
rolls around, Walker would
be a 49-year-old white evangelical, hardly the sort of profile that
would present a different face of the GOP to voters.
The
governor’s profile and personal style probably wouldn’t help his party
reach out to Hispanics or younger voters, though his blue-collar style
might have appeal to
working-class voters, particularly in the Midwest. But Republicans have
showed strength with those working-class voters for years, going all
the way back to Reagan Democrats.
On the other hand, Rubio, who is fluent in Spanish, appears to check most of the party’s boxes.
His
Cuban heritage may not be an unadulterated asset among non-Cuban
Hispanics around the nation, but at 44 years of age he presents an image
of youthfulness.
Rubio also has some charisma, and he has often delivered upbeat, Reagan-like speeches about opportunity, hope and the future.
In
a party filled with elected officials and rank-and-file voters who seem
to care more about getting angry than about getting elected, Rubio’s
style is exactly what the
GOP needs. And his contrast to former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
Clinton is clear, both on issues and generationally.
And
unlike many of his competitors in the Republican race, Rubio has the
potential to rally a wide range of GOP base voters behind his candidacy,
both from the party’s
establishment and tea party wings, as he showed in his 2010 Senate
race.
Is
Rubio the perfect answer for the GOP? Of course not. Nobody is. Every
potential nominee has weaknesses, vulnerabilities and liabilities, as
well as things to prove.
There
continue to be questions about Rubio’s ability to handle the media
scrutiny and the political limelight. He has a lengthy legislative
record, having been first elected
to the Florida House in a late 1999 special election — which means he
has cast plenty of votes, in Tallahassee and on Capitol Hill.
Rubio
will need to demonstrate some policy heft and a thoughtful seriousness
when confronted with complicated questions. His handling of a Chris
Wallace question about
the Iraq war on Fox News Sunday on May 17 at the very least raises
questions about his preparedness.
But
the Florida senator starts off his bid for the Republican nomination as
the one top-tier hopeful who can bridge the party’s ideological divide
and offer a different,
more welcoming face and voice for the GOP. Given the nation’s changing
demographics, those are not insignificant assets.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com



No comments:
Post a Comment