A court lacks jurisdiction to consider an alien’s unexhausted challenge to his hearing notice. An adverse credibility determination was adequately supported by substantial evidence where an alien never raised his claim of part harm during the processing of multiple prior deportations, and when he did finally raise such harms in conjunction with his current deportation, he continuously altered his story about those harms in terms of the nature and timing of his injuries.
For more information contact us at http://www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment