New York Times (Editorial)
March 1, 2016
More
than two weeks after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, President
Obama has not named a nominee for the vacant seat on the Supreme Court.
Instead, he appears to
be succumbing once again to his persistent belief that congressional
Republicans can be reasoned with if only he tries hard enough.
One
would have thought the years of disrespect and obstruction from Capitol
Hill would have cured him of this notion. But on Tuesday morning, Mr.
Obama met with Senator
Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, and Senator Charles
Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, the two
Republicans who are leading the charge to prevent him from selecting a
replacement. Of course, nothing came of the brief
meeting.
Mr.
Grassley issued another insulting comment Monday, in response to a
demand by Senator Harry Reid, the minority leader, that Republicans do
their duty: “It doesn’t matter
how much he jumps up and down and stomps his feet, we aren’t going to
let the far left get away with denying the American people the
opportunity to be heard.”
What does Mr. Obama think he will accomplish by talking to a brick wall?
Almost
from the moment Justice Scalia died, top Senate Republicans have not
only vowed that they will refuse to vote on any nominee Mr. Obama sends
them, but also said
they won’t even meet with that person.
Mr.
McConnell has said that the nomination “will be determined by whoever
wins the presidency in the polls,” and that as long as he is in power
“there will not be action
taken.” Mr. Grassley initially said he would at least wait to see who
the nominee is, but he soon fell back in line and said he would not
allow any hearings.
Instead
of wasting his time pretending to have conversations with these people,
Mr. Obama should name a replacement for the vacancy — now. As President
Ronald Reagan said
in 1987, “every day that passes with the Supreme Court below full
strength impairs the people’s business in that crucially important
body.”
Luckily,
Mr. Obama has many highly qualified candidates to choose from. Several
have already been vetted and approved by Congress, like Sri Srinivasan, a
federal appeals
court judge for the District of Columbia Circuit whom the Senate
confirmed in 2013 by a vote of 97 to 0. And Jane Kelly, another federal
appeals court judge confirmed the same year by a vote of 96 to 0. During
confirmation hearings for Judge Kelly, Mr. Grassley
praised her “reputation for compassion and fairness.”
It
is unclear what the president is waiting for. Surely the White House
had a short list of candidates in hand long before Justice Scalia died.
Mr.
McConnell has said repeatedly that the American people should have a
voice in this nomination. Well, the people have spoken: They elected Mr.
Obama twice. And in the
past few weeks, multiple polls have found that more Americans want Mr.
Obama to make the pick than want him to leave it to the next president.
In a poll by Fox News, the split was 62 to 34 in favor of Mr. Obama.
Republicans who like to point out that the American
people rebuked the president in the 2014 midterm elections should
remember that Mr. Obama’s job-approval rating in December was 46
percent, 35 points higher than the Senate’s.
By
naming his pick now, Mr. Obama would force the Republicans to explain
to Americans why they refuse to do their job and take a vote on a highly
qualified nominee.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment