LOS ANGELES TIMES (Article by Paloma Esquivel and John M. Glionna): PHOENIX -- Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer called it a victory for all Americans. But undocumented worker Jorge Martinez said the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Monday to uphold part of the state's immigration law was a bitter defeat that would cause fear among immigrants and Latinos.
"I feel disillusioned," said the immigrant activist in Phoenix. "I didn't think this would happen."
For many, the courts decision today was a mixed bag that would no doubt see another day in court. The high court struck down most of Arizona's strict law targeting illegal immigrants, but said Arizona's police officers can stop, question and briefly detain immigrants if they have reason to believe the immigrants are in the country illegally.
The justices also said the federal government has the ultimate authority to decide who will be held on immigration charges and deported. Police officers can stop people they suspect are illegal immigrants, the justices said, but they have limited authority. Police departments must check with federal immigration agents before deciding to hold the suspects.
The justices also blocked parts of Arizona's SB 1070 that would have made it a state crime for illegal immigrants to not carry documents or to seek work. The court's decision appears to give states such as Arizona a quite-limited role in enforcing laws against illegal immigrants. Police departments can notify federal agents if they have a suspect in custody, but they cannot keep the suspect in a county jail on simply on state immigration charges.
Reaction to the ruling varied widely. Proponents of anti-immigration laws called the decision a first step to an America with more secure borders. Many immigrants, either with legal documents or without, fear the law will break up families.
Arizona Democratic Party Executive Director Luis Heredia said he was disappointed by the decision. "The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled section 2B of SB 1070 to be constitutional. That does not make it just or moral. Other parts were ruled unconstitutional as further evidence why this law is flawed…. This law does nothing to protect or strengthen Arizona."
Immigrant activists also blasted parts of the decision that gave police more powers in stopping undocumented workers.
"Women immigrants are making enormous social and economic contributions in communities across the United States," said Jessica González-Rojas, executive director of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. "Laws like SB 1070 completely ignore this reality and reflect a broken system that leaves women in the shadows."
Miriam Yeung, executive director of the National Asian Pacific American Womens Forum, echoed those sentiments. "SB 1070, even with some provisions removed, threatens to tear families apart and create a dangerous level of mistrust between law enforcement and women immigrants who fear detention," she said.
By upholding one of the most harmful provisions of the law, the U.S. Supreme Court has set a dangerous precedent.
But conservatives called the decision a warning to the federal government to shore up the nations borders from illegal immigration.
"It's time for the federal government to step up to its constitutional responsibility to secure our borders, enforce our immigration laws fairly, and to partner with states rather than sue them to accomplish this important objective, said Rick Santorum, a former GOP presidential candidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment