Washington Times
By Seth McLaughlin
May 5, 2014
While
most of the Republicans testing the 2016 presidential waters are in
favor of a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, the GOP’s
Senate candidates are generally
focusing on the enforcement side, calling for a crackdown — a striking
difference that underscores just how difficult the issue is for the
party.
With
the exception of Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, Republican presidential
candidates have generally been to the left of their party on
immigration, with George W. Bush
and Sen. John McCain leading the pack.
The
same sort of scenario is playing out in the run-up to the Republican
nomination race, with the exceptions of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who opposes
amnesty for illegals,
and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, who says that lawmakers
should secure the border first before discussing anything else.
But
Senate candidates, responding to a much different electorate, tack to
the right, and it’s difficult to find even incumbent Republican senators
who are running on a
platform of legalizing illegal immigrants.
Alfonso
Aguilar, executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative
Principles, said the GOP Senate candidates who get attention are usually
in states with
small numbers of Hispanic voters, and don’t need to cater to their
vote. But national-level candidates do need to pay attention to Latinos,
which can mean softening their message.
“It
is a different constituency and at this point, where Latinos are going
to make a difference, and are going to be decisive, is at the national
level,” Mr. Aguilar said,
adding that he believes the GOP is poised to rally around a proposal
that ties together border enforcement and some sort of legalization.
Others,
though, say that the presidential candidates are listening to misguided
consultants and bias polling, while the congressional candidates are
more in tune with
voters.
“They
certainly don’t want an amnesty right now,” Steve Camarota, of the
Center for Immigration Studies, said, alluding to everyday voters. “What
they would prefer is
the law being enforced. I think that is what we are seeing and that is
why most of the candidates don’t take that position.”
Rep.
Paul Broun, who is running in a five-way primary race in Georgia for
retiring Sen. Saxby Chambliss’ seat, is touting how he championed a “No
Amnesty” resolution “that
would keep Congress from granting citizenship or legalized status to
those who entered the US, or stayed in the US, illegally.”
In
North Carolina, state house Speaker Thom Tillis, who is leading in a
crowded field and received the endorsement of former Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush, who is pro-legalization,
says he opposes amnesty and believes that Congress should secure the
border before it even thinks about other chances in our immigration
laws.
“We
need to seal the border,” Mr. Tillis said in a debate. “We need to be
clear that there is no such thing as amnesty. Amnesty has been tired it
didn’t work. It created
a bigger problem.”
Even
in Colorado — a state where Mr. Aguilar said Hispanic voters will play a
bigger than average role — Rep. Cory Gardner, who is challenging
Democratic Sen. Mark Udall,
says he opposes amnesty and wants to crack down on employers who hire
illegal workers.
These
are the same sorts of arguments that helped sink a bill pushed by Sen.
Marco Rubio and a bipartisan group of eight Senators that would have
granted quick legal status
to illegal immigrants, with the chance for a full pathway to citizenship in later years.
Mr.
Bush embraced the bill, as did Rep. Paul Ryan and New Jersey Gov. Chris
Christie, who also signed a law in his state granting illegal
immigrants in-state tuition rates
to state colleges and universities.
Former
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee also embraced a pathway to citizenship in
the past,” telling The Washington Post in 2006 that the “rational
approach is to find a way
to give people a pathway to citizenship.”
For
his part, Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, has embraced legalizing
the millions here illegally by expanding work visas. He voted against
Mr. Rubio’s legalization
bill, but said the problem was that it didn’t expand legal immigration
enough.
Ford O’Connell, a GOP strategist, said those candidates are eyeing the presidential math.
“If
you go solely for blue collar white voters, yes, you can win a
presidential election, there is no doubt about it, but you have to
thread a very narrow needle, and
that window is going to keep closing,” the strategist said.
“Nobody
is saying that immigration is going to get you votes,” he said. “What a
lot of people are saying is that, ‘We have a problem and it is only
getting exacerbated
because it is easier to come her illegally then legally and, frankly,
eventually you are going to run out of white voters. So this is more
seen as a doorway to being able to being able to begin that
conversation.”
Others,
though, have warned that any proposal that leads to more immigration
could doom the conservative wing of the Republican party because most
Hispanics share the
big government views of Democrats.
“How
does dramatically increasing the number of votes in the country who
generally agree with the Democratic party help Republicans?” Mr.
Camarota said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment