An asylum-seeker waived review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary denial of his application by failing to contest that aspect of the board’s decision in his opening brief, and instead raising it for the first time in his reply brief. The board correctly concluded that the asylum-seeker’s proposed social group of known drug users lacked definable boundaries and therefore could not serve as a legally cognizable social group.
For more information contact us at http://www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment