Fusion (Op-Ed)
By Cruz Reynoso
August 7, 2015
As a grandfather, the tragic shooting of Kate Steinle at San Francisco’s pier 14 saddens my soul.
To her family, I offer my condolences.
Unfortunately, finger-pointing and scapegoating have swirled since this tragedy occurred.
Some
ideologues, like Donald Trump, have sought to use the actions one
person is accused of to slander all 11 million undocumented people –
and, indeed, all 54 million
Latinos – who call the United States home.
As a long-time judge, I’ve observed that the first version of events we hear frequently does not tell us the full story.
It’s imperative to take a comprehensive look at all the facts in this tragedy in order to craft effective solutions.
The first question is how the man accused of the shooting came to San Francisco.
The
suspect, Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was already in federal custody, yet
was sent to San Francisco from the Federal Bureau of Prisons on a
20-year-old warrant for marijuana
charges. The evidence for this charge had long since been purged, but
the warrant still existed.
A common-sense solution presents itself: cleanse the system of these outdated warrants.
The
next question concerns the immigration “hold” or detainer which ICE
officials placed one on the suspect when he came into local custody.
A
core principle of the American legal system is that no human being can
be detained or searched without a valid reason. Police cannot search
your house, go through your
car, or arrest you without justification. The decision is not an
officer’s to make, but falls to a judge. (Judges must quickly review
arrests made on the street.) Enshrined in the Constitution’s Fourth
Amendment, the origins of this principle go all the way
back to England.
Unfortunately,
ICE holds do not have any kind of oversight from our legal system. They
have caused even U.S. citizens (some wrongfully deported in the past,
an experience
my own family faced many years ago), permanent residents, and crime
victims to be wrongly held for extra time and turned over for
deportation. A federal court confirmed last year in Miranda-Olivares vs.
Clackamas that without judicial review, the holds are
unconstitutional.
Other
contact between local law enforcement and immigration authorities – who
already receive the fingerprints of everyone booked into jail
automatically – should also
be very carefully considered. It could easily lead to scenarios where a
survivor of domestic violence calls police for help, gets mistakenly
arrested along with the abuser, and is then turned over to ICE,
jeopardizing confidence in law enforcement. It could
easily lead to detentions that violate the Constitution.
Sadly,
the House of Representatives has just passed a profoundly misguided
bill that ignores these principles, putting community trust policies at
risk. And unfortunately,
California Senators Feinstein and Boxer and Rep. Jackie Speier have
also announced they may consider a version of this legislation to coerce
locals to “turn over” for deportation immigrants who may have certain
records.
This could violate the 10th Amendment separation of powers between federal and local governments.
Moreover,
we need to ensure that the current debate doesn’t paint a false picture
of immigrant communities. A new report from the American Immigration
Council found that
between 1990 and 2013, as the number of undocumented immigrants
increased from 3.5 million to 11.2 million, the nation’s violent crime
rate declined 48 percent.
But what about immigrants who do have convictions?
We
must bear in mind that many who have had felonies in their pasts have
been rehabilitated and now lead productive lives. For example, Daniel
Maher heads up recycling
operations for an environmental agency in Berkeley, CA and serves as an
instructor in a program which trains at-risk youth for jobs in the
environmental sector. Maher, currently facing deportation under federal
priorities, recently stated: “I was young, and
I made a mistake. But I worked hard to turn my life around. I am not a
risk to the public.”
This is the time to embrace our values of truth, justice, and fairness – not to abandon them.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment