Washington Post
By Amber Phillips
August 17, 2015
Bolded
in his newly released plan on how Donald Trump would solve our
country's immigration problems if he becomes president is a suggestion
to triple the number of law-enforcement
agents working to guard the border.
That
and other measures Trump proposes — including deporting immigrants
convicted of a crime and detaining and deporting immigrants caught
crossing the border illegally
— would amount to a significant increase in deportation. An estimated
11 million immigrants are in the country illegally.
And
during an appearance Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," Trump seemed to
suggest he would kick out most immigrants who are in the country
illegally. Here's a transcript
(The Fix boss annotated it, too!):
TRUMP: The executive order gets rescinded. One good thing about —
TODD: You'll rescind that one, too? You'll rescind the Dream Act executive order, the DACA?
TRUMP: We have to make a whole new set of standards. And when people come in, they have to come in —
TODD: You're going to split up families. You're going to deport children?
TRUMP: Chuck — no, no. No, we're going to keep the families together. We have to keep the families together.
TODD: But you're going to kick them out?
TRUMP: They have to go.
TODD: What if they have no place to go?
TRUMP:
We will work with them. They have to go. Chuck, we either have a
country or we don't have a country. Either we have a country or not.
[Donald Trump can earn his $10 billion fortune in only 217 million days of jury duty]
As
with many things Trump, he's appealing to a vocal minority of
Americans. And on this particular issue, he's also appealing to a vocal
minority of his fellow Republicans
— most of whom disagree with him.
In
polling conducted in June and July, Gallup gave Americans three options
on what to do with immigrants who are in the country illegally:
Let them stay and give some who meet certain requirements a path to citizenship.
Let them stay and work for a limited amount of time.
Deport them.
Gallup
found that 65 percent of all Americans favored some sort of path to citizenship. The next-most-popular option was deportation, but just 19
percent favored that
option, while 14 percent wanted to let them stay for limited amount of
time.
Here are the results over time:
The
polling, conducted as part of Gallup's 2015 Minority Rights project,
included larger-than-normal samples of Hispanic and black Americans.
But
Trump is not trying to appeal to the broadest swath of Americans
possible. He's angling for the most conservative support. Among
Republicans, public opinion on plans
that favor deportation are slightly more popular than with America as a
whole, but not enough.
According to Gallup, about half of Republicans support a path to citizenship, and that is the most common view within the party.
Here's how the rest of the party breaks down among the options:
That
31 percent of Republicans favoring deportation is actually higher than
in 2006, when President George W. Bush favored legislation that included
a path to citizenship.
Here
are how the parties have broken down over that span, with Republicans
moving toward deportation and Democrats toward letting illegal
immigrants stay.
A
June poll by the nonprofit Public Religion Research Institute found
that an even higher number of Republicans — 57 percent — supported a
pathway to citizenship, provided
immigrants meet certain requirements.
Once
you get past the d-word, though, Trump's immigration policies begin to
have broader appeal. A 2013 Gallup survey found that Americans —
especially Republicans — do
support measures such as tightening border security (Trump also wants
to build a wall somehow paid for by Mexico) and requiring U.S. business
owners to check a person's immigration status before hiring him/her
(Trump wants to implement a national e-verify
system).
Trump
was never going to please moderates on illegal immigration, especially
after his comments about illegal immigrants from Mexico. And his view on
deportation is one
that even the vast majority of conservative politicians decline to
take.
If he wants to expand his appeal beyond where it is today, he would be better served talking about other enforcement measures.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment