Politico
By Seung Min Kim
August 7, 2015
The
Obama administration is asking a federal judge to reconsider her ruling
that called for the release of tens of thousands of immigrant mothers
and children who tried
to cross the southern border illegally.
In
a 60-page response filed late Thursday, Justice Department lawyers
argued that family detention facilities run by the Department of
Homeland Security are a necessary
tool to help deter illegal migration to the United States.
The
court order — issued by Judge Dolly Gee of the U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California — could mean that immigrant families
could not be held in
detention facilities beyond five days, DOJ attorneys said. That would
“functionally terminate” the ability of federal immigration officials to
place the immigrants into deportation proceedings, because that could
not get done in such a short time frame, according
to DOJ.
“The
proposed order would greatly impact DHS’s operational capacity and its
ability to secure the borders while facilitating lawful trade and
travel,” Obama administration
lawyers wrote in the filing.
It
also warned that the court decision “could cause another notable
increase in the numbers of parents choosing to cross the border with
their children.”
Last
month, Gee found that the practice of detaining immigrant mothers and
families violated a court settlement from 1997 involving children in the
United States illegally,
which requires that they be held in the “least restrictive” conditions
possible.
The
ruling revived calls from Democrats and immigration advocates to
shutter detention facilities designed to hold mothers and children.
Hillary
Clinton, the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination,
has criticized the practice, as has former Maryland Gov. Martin
O’Malley, a long-shot Clinton
opponent who tweeted Friday: “The US is a welcoming, compassionate
country yet we insist on jailing vulnerable women and children. Why
didn’t @DHSgov #EndFamilyDetention?”
And
the Obama administration’s policies on detaining immigrant families
caught at the border have run into steep opposition from Democrats on
Capitol Hill. Nearly all
members of the House Democratic Caucus signed onto a letter circulated
last week by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), a former immigration attorney
who is the ranking member on a House subcommittee overseeing the policy.
“It
is long past time to end family detention,” the House Democrats wrote
in the letter. “In light of this recent federal court ruling, we urge
you take all necessary
and appropriate steps to bring the Department’s practices in line with
the settlement agreement and the recent court ruling.”
Senate Democrats have sent similar missives to Johnson.
Immigrant-rights
groups on Friday were immediately outraged by the Justice Department’s
response, with the American Immigration Lawyers Association saying the
administration
should be “embarrassed” by its response to the court order.
“Ever
since Judge Gee first threatened her order, the administration has been
scrambling to quickly release some of the mothers and children, and
they’ve bungled the process
badly, leaving in detention many women and children who have been
locked up way too long,” the group’s president, Victor Nieblas Pradis,
said. “The government’s protest that ‘we’ve fixed things, we promise’
rings hollow when the sharp light of reality shines
on the detention centers.
Homeland
Security officials have revised their detention policies in response to
the pressure from Democrats and immigration advocates. Still, they have
defended the practice
as a way to deter more migrants, particularly from Central America,
from entering the United States illegally.
More
than 68,440 immigrant family members — generally children with their
mothers — were apprehended at the southern border in between October
2013 and September 2014,
according to government statistics. In comparison, about 24,900 have
been apprehended at the border from last October to this June.
Despite
that steep drop, the number of immigrants being caught at the southern
border is “still substantially higher than has been the case for many
years,” the Justice
Department said.
Also,
a surge of unaccompanied migrant children arriving at the border
prompted a congressional battle last summer over additional funding to
deal with the crisis. But
a divided Congress never passed a supplemental funding bill, and the
Obama administration took steps on its own to try and stem the influx.
Two
of the largest centers that are detaining immigrant mothers and
children are located in Texas — in Dilley and in Karnes County. The
Dilley facility holds 2,400 people
and is currently housing 1,182 immigrants, a spokeswoman for
Immigration and Customs Enforcement said.
The
Karnes County center can hold up to 532 people and is currently holding
193, the spokeswoman said. A smaller facility in Berks County,
Pennsylvania currently is holding
76 immigrants. Before the two larger facilities opened, immigrant
families had been held at other detention centers — such as a temporary
one located in Artesia, New Mexico, which was shut down last fall.
Republicans
have pushed the Obama administration to keep their family detention
practices intact. In a letter to Johnson last week, House Judiciary
Committee Chairman
Bob Goodlatte of Virginia argued that detaining immigrant mothers and
children who cross the border illegally was an effective way to ensure
they show up for their immigration court hearings.
Statistics
from the Justice Department’s Executive Office of Immigration Review
show that 84 percent of undocumented immigrants with children who have
not been detained
skip their court hearings. For migrant children without a parent, it’s
46 percent who don’t appear for their hearings.
“I
understand that to fight this case may be an arduous undertaking in the
face of well-funded and very motivated advocacy groups that decry any
immigration enforcement,”
Goodlatte, himself a former immigration lawyer, wrote to Johnson. “But
your duty is to the American people to prevent and deter unlawful border
entries.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment