New York Times (Editorial):
July 13, 2015
Kathryn
Steinle was killed on a pier in San Francisco on July 1, allegedly by a
troubled immigrant who had a stolen gun and a long criminal history and
had been deported
five times. The shooting was inexplicable, yet Ms. Steinle’s family and
friends have been shunning talk of politics and vengeance, while
expressing the hope that some good might emerge from this tragedy.
The
shooting has turned the usual American tensions over immigration into a
frenzy. The accused, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, has become the
dark-skinned face of the
Mexican killers that Donald Trump — in a racist speech announcing his
presidential campaign, and numerous interviews thereafter — has been
warning the nation about.
Others
in the race and in Congress have eagerly joined him in exploiting the
crime, proposing bills to punish “sanctuary cities,” like San Francisco,
that discourage local
involvement in immigration enforcement, and to force them to cooperate
with the federal government in an ever-wider, harsher deportation
dragnet.
Mr.
Lopez-Sanchez was a repeat illegal border-crosser with a drug record,
but he somehow ended up back on the street. His case led to epic rounds
of blame-shifting last
week, as the various government agencies that had Mr. Lopez-Sanchez in
their custody at some point — like the San Francisco sheriff’s office
and Immigration and Customs Enforcement — tried to explain why this
wasn’t their fault. Right-wing commenters and politicians,
shamelessly willing to scapegoat 11 million unauthorized immigrants as a
criminal class and national-security threat, were pointing fingers at
anyone and everyone, from President Obama on down.
Lost
in the screaming were the sound reasons that cities and localities shun
the role of immigration enforcers. They are balancing public safety
with a respect for civil
rights and the Constitution. San Francisco had received an ICE request,
called a detainer, to hold Mr. Lopez-Sanchez, but detainers are
unconstitutional; a person can’t be held without charge just for ICE’s
convenience. Turning the local police and sheriff’s
deputies into de facto ICE agents heightens fear and distrust in
immigrant communities, which makes fighting crime harder.
Lost,
too, is the truth that immigrants are by no definition a population of
criminals. A report published last week by the American Immigration
Council found that immigrants
— whether legal or unauthorized, and no matter their country of origin
or education level — are less likely to be criminals than native-born
Americans, that periods of high immigration correspond with lower crime
rates, and that this has been true in this
country as long as this issue has been studied.
Separating
real threats from the harmless, productive majority of immigrants has
long been a challenge. For years the Obama administration made the
problem worse through
a misguided program of local-level immigration policing called Secure
Communities. It became a dragnet, shredding trust between residents and
the local police in immigrant communities. Over time, hundreds of
jurisdictions refused to participate.
The
Homeland Security secretary, Jeh Johnson, last fall announced his plan
to replace Secure Communities with a new Priority Enforcement Program,
which would only seek
custody of immigrants convicted of certain serious crimes, and only by
asking the local authorities to notify ICE about their imminent release.
If the program had been in place in San Francisco earlier in the year, a
phone call might have kept Mr. Lopez-Sanchez
off the streets.
The
Priority Enforcement Program needs to work with cities and
law-enforcement agencies across the board — to reassure those that are
rightly wary of ICE and to restrain
those that are only too eager to overreach and abuse their power. But
with strong protections against racial profiling, it could strike the
balance. “It’s irresponsible,” Mr. Johnson told The Times, “not to have
some sort of program or protocol by which we
work with local sheriffs and police chiefs to transfer dangerous
criminals who are undocumented to us.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment